svenvh added a comment. > @svenvh I remember that we have also discussed the addition of a vendor > specific header where such feature/extension macro definition can be added to > avoid the macro pollution but I feel this is somewhat orthogonal i.e. the > fine grained control of macro defines is still needed?
Unfortunately I don't remember the details of that discussion, but I agree that it's worth looking into a solution for issue #55674, using e.g. `__undef` macros as you described above. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D137652/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D137652 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
