ChuanqiXu marked an inline comment as done. ChuanqiXu added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp:192 + "p1689-targeted-directory", llvm::cl::Optional, + llvm::cl::desc("Only supported for P1689, the targeted directory of which " + "the dependencies are to be computed."), ---------------- ben.boeckel wrote: > I'm not sure what this means. Is it the compiler's working directory when > compiling? In fact, the option is not used actually for P1689 now. The idea of the patch is to construct a compilation database from these 4 command line options. And the existence for the option is the placeholder and for the consistency. So you can fill the value as if you (or cmake) are generating a compilation database entry for this. ================ Comment at: clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp:197 +llvm::cl::opt<std::string> P1689TargetedCommand( + "p1689-targeted-command", llvm::cl::Optional, + llvm::cl::desc("Only supported for P1689, the targeted command of which " ---------------- ben.boeckel wrote: > Can this be something like `--` so that I don't have to figure out how to > quote the thing (for the shell and whatever parsing Clang does internally)? Yeah, it can. Both `-` and `--` are accepted. I've updated the test to disambiguate. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D137534/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D137534 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits