ChuanqiXu marked an inline comment as done.
ChuanqiXu added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp:192
+    "p1689-targeted-directory", llvm::cl::Optional,
+    llvm::cl::desc("Only supported for P1689, the targeted directory of which "
+                   "the dependencies are to be computed."),
----------------
ben.boeckel wrote:
> I'm not sure what this means. Is it the compiler's working directory when 
> compiling?
In fact, the option is not used actually for P1689 now. The idea of the patch 
is to construct a compilation database from these 4 command line options. And 
the existence for the option is the placeholder and for the consistency. So you 
can fill the value as if you (or cmake) are generating a compilation database 
entry for this.


================
Comment at: clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp:197
+llvm::cl::opt<std::string> P1689TargetedCommand(
+    "p1689-targeted-command", llvm::cl::Optional,
+    llvm::cl::desc("Only supported for P1689, the targeted command of which "
----------------
ben.boeckel wrote:
> Can this be something like `--` so that I don't have to figure out how to 
> quote the thing (for the shell and whatever parsing Clang does internally)?
Yeah, it can. Both `-` and `--` are accepted. I've updated the test to 
disambiguate.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D137534/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D137534

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to