kadircet accepted this revision.
kadircet added inline comments.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/TidyFastChecks.inc:2
+// This file is generated, do not edit it directly!
+// This describes
+#ifndef FAST
----------------
can you also re-run the script before checking in (or update here, since
re-running all might take a while, but would be a good way to test history
preserving logic)
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/TidyFastChecks.py:76
+print(f"""// This file is generated, do not edit it directly!
+// Deltas are perncentage regression in parsing {args.file}
+#ifndef FAST
----------------
s/perncentage/percentage
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/TidyFastChecks.py:83
+ print(f"{decision} {check} {time}% <= {threshold}%", file=sys.stderr)
+ print(f"{decision}({check}, {time})")
+
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> kadircet wrote:
> > i don't see the point in including delta in the output if we're also making
> > the decision here. is it mostly for debugging purposes? e.g. when updating
> > the list we get to see the difference?
> Yes, that's exactly the reason. Can make it a comment instead if you like,
> but that makes ad-hoc analysis slightly harder.
if that's the case no need. just wanted to make sure about it.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138491/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138491
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
