tom-anders added a comment. In D138425#3941206 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D138425#3941206>, @sammccall wrote:
> In D138425#3941183 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D138425#3941183>, @v1nh1shungry > wrote: > >> Yes, there is a common situation where people use a meaningless template >> parameter name, but I think the same for functions. > > I don't think it's the same: my wild guess would be 30% of function params > have useless names, and 90% of template params do. > If this were accurate, it seems function param hints are usually > (potentially) useful, while template params are almost always useless. I agree that is usually useless and too much noise, especially for container like types. But, it could maybe be useful for template parameters that have a default value? For example, I'll never need an inlay hint for something like `std::map<K, V>, but when passing a custom comparator and allocator as the 3rd and 4th template type, inlay hints might actually be helpful there. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D138425/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D138425 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
