dfrib added a comment. In D126818#3935740 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126818#3935740>, @rjmccall wrote:
> I'm too often slow to actually apply edits to the ABI document. There's been > plenty of time for feedback on this one; go ahead and act like it's accepted. CWG 2596 was discussed at Kona and, afaict, CWG is opting for a path of least effort, with a different result <https://wg21.cmeerw.net/cwg/issue2596> than what is implemented this patch and previously discussed in the ABI issue <https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/24#issuecomment-934713719>: > **CWG 2022-11-10** > > The friend definitions should conflict with friend definitions from other > instantiations of the same class template, consistent with how > non-constrained friends would work. Note that the enclosing dependent class > type does not appear in the friend function's signature, which is unusual. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126818/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126818 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
