tbaeder marked an inline comment as done.
tbaeder added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/AST/Interp/functions.cpp:88-97
+constexpr int invalid() {
+ // Invalid expression in visit().
+ while(huh) {}
+}
+
+constexpr void invalid2() {
+ int i = 0;
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> There should definitely be diagnostics here, right? There's a use of an
> undeclared identifier in each function, but also, `invalid()` doesn't have a
> return statement despite returning an `int`.
Right, I forgot to update the tests, sorry!
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137386/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137386
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
