royjacobson added a comment. I worry about this mangling issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54993. For std::make_index_sequence that wasn't that big of a deal, since nobody really uses that as return type of (template) functions, but my guess is that enough people do things like
template<class T> decay_t<T> copy(T t); that this might become a problem here. Also, it would be nice to have some numbers for the 'measurably faster' claim :) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D137458/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D137458 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
