This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rGf007c99ed12f: [clang][Interp] Fix InterpFrame::describe() 
for This pointers (authored by tbaeder).

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D136670/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D136670

Files:
  clang/lib/AST/Interp/InterpFrame.cpp
  clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp


Index: clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp
+++ clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp
@@ -257,11 +257,6 @@
   static_assert(D.Val == 0, ""); // ref-error {{not an integral constant 
expression}} \
                                  // ref-note {{initializer of 'D' is not a 
constant expression}}
 
-#if 0
-  // FIXME: This test is currently disabled because the failing constructor 
call
-  //   causes us to run into an assertion later on in the new interpreter.
-  //   Once that is fixed, we fail successfully but the diagnostic uses the
-  //   wrong value.
   struct AnotherBase {
     int Val;
     constexpr AnotherBase(int i) : Val(12 / i) {} //ref-note {{division by 
zero}} \
@@ -274,9 +269,7 @@
   constexpr AnotherBase Derp(0); // ref-error {{must be initialized by a 
constant expression}} \
                                  // ref-note {{in call to 'AnotherBase(0)'}} \
                                  // expected-error {{must be initialized by a 
constant expression}} \
-                                 // expected-note {{in call to 'AnotherBase(}}
-                                 // FIXME Previous note uses the wrong value
-#endif
+                                 // expected-note {{in call to 
'AnotherBase(0)'}}
 
   struct YetAnotherBase {
     int Val;
Index: clang/lib/AST/Interp/InterpFrame.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/AST/Interp/InterpFrame.cpp
+++ clang/lib/AST/Interp/InterpFrame.cpp
@@ -149,7 +149,11 @@
     OS << "->";
   }
   OS << *F << "(";
-  unsigned Off = Func->hasRVO() ? primSize(PT_Ptr) : 0;
+  unsigned Off = 0;
+
+  Off += Func->hasRVO() ? primSize(PT_Ptr) : 0;
+  Off += Func->hasThisPointer() ? primSize(PT_Ptr) : 0;
+
   for (unsigned I = 0, N = F->getNumParams(); I < N; ++I) {
     QualType Ty = F->getParamDecl(I)->getType();
 


Index: clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp
+++ clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp
@@ -257,11 +257,6 @@
   static_assert(D.Val == 0, ""); // ref-error {{not an integral constant expression}} \
                                  // ref-note {{initializer of 'D' is not a constant expression}}
 
-#if 0
-  // FIXME: This test is currently disabled because the failing constructor call
-  //   causes us to run into an assertion later on in the new interpreter.
-  //   Once that is fixed, we fail successfully but the diagnostic uses the
-  //   wrong value.
   struct AnotherBase {
     int Val;
     constexpr AnotherBase(int i) : Val(12 / i) {} //ref-note {{division by zero}} \
@@ -274,9 +269,7 @@
   constexpr AnotherBase Derp(0); // ref-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} \
                                  // ref-note {{in call to 'AnotherBase(0)'}} \
                                  // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} \
-                                 // expected-note {{in call to 'AnotherBase(}}
-                                 // FIXME Previous note uses the wrong value
-#endif
+                                 // expected-note {{in call to 'AnotherBase(0)'}}
 
   struct YetAnotherBase {
     int Val;
Index: clang/lib/AST/Interp/InterpFrame.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/AST/Interp/InterpFrame.cpp
+++ clang/lib/AST/Interp/InterpFrame.cpp
@@ -149,7 +149,11 @@
     OS << "->";
   }
   OS << *F << "(";
-  unsigned Off = Func->hasRVO() ? primSize(PT_Ptr) : 0;
+  unsigned Off = 0;
+
+  Off += Func->hasRVO() ? primSize(PT_Ptr) : 0;
+  Off += Func->hasThisPointer() ? primSize(PT_Ptr) : 0;
+
   for (unsigned I = 0, N = F->getNumParams(); I < N; ++I) {
     QualType Ty = F->getParamDecl(I)->getType();
 
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to