NoQ added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/region-store.c:66
+ // expected-warning@+1 {{passing arguments to 'b' without a prototype is
deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C2x}}
+ b(&buffer);
+}
----------------
steakhal wrote:
> tomasz-kaminski-sonarsource wrote:
> > tomasz-kaminski-sonarsource wrote:
> > > I would like to see an example where the called function is implicitly
> > > defined.
> > After rethinking it, I have not idea how to construct that example.
> I could not construct such an example.
> It seems like clang errors out for cases when an implicit declaration of a
> call mismatches with the definition of that function.
> https://godbolt.org/z/rM9ajeTf7
Yeah, if you scroll really far to the right, you'll see that the first error is
actually a warning auto-promoted to an error. So you can pass
`-Wno-implicit-function-declaration` and it'll disappear. Not sure what to do
with the other error though, it really does notice that the implicit definition
conflicts with the later explicit definition. So, dunno.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136162/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136162
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
