hel-ableton added a comment. I'm not sure I'm following where you're getting at. So far I'm getting the following:
- my proposed fix was not ideal, and only "accidentally" fixed our issue - the fix including `Previous.isOneOf(TT_BinaryOperator...` is a better fix - we should write a proper test case for that fix, as the one I submitted referred to the wrong fix - the example you gave now (as a model to construct such a better test?) doesn't involve `TT_CtorInitializerColon` or any of the like, so... I'm confused. :-) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D136154/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D136154 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
