owenpan added a comment. In D135918#3857711 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D135918#3857711>, @HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> Fun fact, there is one instance of such a case within the clang-format code. > I can't remember where (I stumbled upon this in January, and tried to fix it > ever since), should that be reformatted with this patch, or with a follow up? Perhaps with a follow-up in which we can reformat the entire directory. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp:333 return false; return !CurrentState.NoLineBreak; ---------------- Return true if `Current` is a conditional colon preceded by a lambda `r_brace` that is followed by a pair of (possibly empty) parentheses. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp:1412-1417 // Add special behavior to support a format commonly used for JavaScript // closures: // SomeFunction(function() { // foo(); // bar(); // }, a, b, c); ---------------- HazardyKnusperkeks wrote: > Someone put that in on purpose, but is that only intended for java script, > then we could add the language check. > As one can see I also had to disable it for requires clauses. Because I think > it is a very hard thing to disable line breaks for all the scopes. > Someone put that in on purpose, but is that only intended for java script, > then we could add the language check. It started as a JavaScript-only behavior but was later extended to cover all languages. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp:1423 + if (State.Stack[State.Stack.size() - 2].NestedBlockInlined && Newline && + // Do not forbid line breaks for directly invoced lambdas. + (!Current.MatchingParen || ---------------- HazardyKnusperkeks wrote: > Or should we limit that to lambdas in a conditional? That would be even > messier to detect. > Or should we limit that to lambdas in a conditional? IMO we should, and it might not be too bad if you override `NoLineBreak` in `canBreak()` instead. See line 333 above. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135918/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135918 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits