arsenm added a comment. In D130096#3850472 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130096#3850472>, @jhuber6 wrote:
> I don't like the fact that we need to have two different kinds of control > constants, one per-TU and others per-link job. I'm wondering how difficult it > would be to make the fast versions of the math calls use different entry > points. That way we could handle this in the math header wrappers. That's really how the C linkage model wants you to handle this. I also would like to have FP value tracking optimizations take care of the special cases in the library code Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D130096/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D130096 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
