erichkeane added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:6938 +def ext_typecheck_indirection_through_void_pointer_cpp + : ExtWarn<"ISO C++ does not allow indirection on operand of type %0">, + // Note: This uses a different diagnostics group than the C diagnostic ---------------- cor3ntin wrote: > erichkeane wrote: > > Bikeshedding appreciated here :) Note that the diagnostic ALSO will show > > up in SFINAE/Concepts explanations, so we can't just say "will be removed" > > or something. > > > The usual terminology is dereferencing. `"ISO C++ does not allow > dereferencing a `void*`" Yeah, I thought the 'indirection' phrasing in the diagnostic above was strange as well, but figured I'd be consistent until someone came up with a good replacement here :) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135287/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135287 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
