tra added a comment. In D135076#3831563 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D135076#3831563>, @MaskRay wrote:
> Another idea is to reject multiple `-o` if some are used as the `Joined` > form. Note: multiple `Separate` `-o` should be allowed. > It will not catch `-offload-*` when `-o output` is not specified, but is > probably useful enough. Is there a reason we should not always reject `-o<existing double-dash option>`? I doubt there are many real life uses of such output names and if/when someone needs them, it's easy enough to disambiguate by using a separate `-o` argument or `-o./output`. This would address the issue for all `--o*` options. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135076/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135076 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
