MyDeveloperDay added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormat.rst:29
USAGE: clang-format [options] [<file> ...]
----------------
if response files are so common place why not say it here
`clang-format [options] [@file]`
I personally don't believe we need to document how a shell works
================
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormat.rst:72
Used only with --dry-run or -n
- --files=<string> - Provide a list of files to run
clang-format
+ --files=<string> - Accept a list of response files
(Deprecated. Use
+ 'clang-format @file' if possbile).
----------------
if you google "response files" you don't get anything that leads to understand
what they are. I understand what it means but I'm not convinced others who have
not come across it before will. I don't personally think this change adds
anything.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D135115/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D135115
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
