ychen added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:5745-5746
+      if (TypeConstraintConcept) {
+        Canon = getAutoTypeInternal(QualType(), Keyword, false, IsPack, 
nullptr,
+                                    {}, true);
         // Find the insert position again.
----------------
mizvekov wrote:
> ychen wrote:
> > ychen wrote:
> > > ychen wrote:
> > > > mizvekov wrote:
> > > > > Also adds back the `isDependent` flag. Any reason to have removed it?
> > > > I was thinking the replacement type is null, so there is no need to 
> > > > depend on instantiation?
> > > > I was thinking the replacement type is null, so there is no need to 
> > > > depend on instantiation?
> > > 
> > > 
> > Sorry I was not precise. I meant the constrained non-canonical AutoType 
> > would always be used for template instantiation. But I think it could 
> > happen that the user may query dependencies of the canonical AutoType of a 
> > constrained AutoType, maybe it just doesn't show up in the codebase yet. 
> > I'll put it back.
> FYI my memory is fuzzy right now, but we do have the distinction between 
> undeduced but non-dependent, and undeduced but dependent. It's suspicious 
> that no tests fail though. It could be either it doesn't matter for the 
> canonical type, or that the test would be a bit convoluted.
Yeah, I'm not confident to remove it right now. Already put it back.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D135088/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D135088

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to