ychen added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:5745-5746 + if (TypeConstraintConcept) { + Canon = getAutoTypeInternal(QualType(), Keyword, false, IsPack, nullptr, + {}, true); // Find the insert position again. ---------------- mizvekov wrote: > ychen wrote: > > ychen wrote: > > > ychen wrote: > > > > mizvekov wrote: > > > > > Also adds back the `isDependent` flag. Any reason to have removed it? > > > > I was thinking the replacement type is null, so there is no need to > > > > depend on instantiation? > > > > I was thinking the replacement type is null, so there is no need to > > > > depend on instantiation? > > > > > > > > Sorry I was not precise. I meant the constrained non-canonical AutoType > > would always be used for template instantiation. But I think it could > > happen that the user may query dependencies of the canonical AutoType of a > > constrained AutoType, maybe it just doesn't show up in the codebase yet. > > I'll put it back. > FYI my memory is fuzzy right now, but we do have the distinction between > undeduced but non-dependent, and undeduced but dependent. It's suspicious > that no tests fail though. It could be either it doesn't matter for the > canonical type, or that the test would be a bit convoluted. Yeah, I'm not confident to remove it right now. Already put it back. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135088/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135088 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits