nikic added a comment. In D20401#3824569 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D20401#3824569>, @nickdesaulniers wrote:
> But I wouldn't be surprised if other Linux distro's like RHEL bootstrap their > clang distribution via GCC. @tstellar or @serge-sans-paille or @nikic might > know. We did get a curious comment from a kernel developer recently claiming > that clang was "twice as slow as GCC" which didn't make much sense; not sure > if it was an exaggeration vs. precise measurement, but I wouldn't be > surprised if evaluation order you identified plays into this, making the > worst method even slower. I'll try to find a link to the thread... For Fedora/RHEL we used to build Clang with GCC -- for Clang 15, we switched to building with Clang. No idea what other distros do. Maybe worth mentioning that the builds on https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/ are done with GCC. Repository: rL LLVM CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D20401/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D20401 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
