aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/AST/Interp/enums.cpp:25
+ SIX = FIVE + 2,
+
+};
----------------
tbaeder wrote:
> shafik wrote:
> > Maybe some edge case values for enumerators like `__INT_MAX__ *2U +1U`
> > (UINT_MAX)
> >
> > and
> >
> > ```
> > enum E { // warning: enumeration values exceed range of largest integer
> > [-Wenum-too-large]
> > E1 = -__LONG_MAX__ -1L,
> > E2 = __LONG_MAX__ *2UL+1UL
> > };
> > ```
> Hm, looks like that test broke one of the windows builders:
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/123/builds/13424 - are enums larger
> by default on Windows? What do you suggest to fix the test?
If we're trying to be compatible with MSVC, we use their rules for picking the
underlying type of an enumeration is which not fixed. One way to handle this is
to add more RUN lines with explicit triples, but I think we lose too much
interesting coverage that way. I'd probably use a `#ifndef _MSC_VER` block to
control the expected diagnostics with a comment as to why the diagnostic is not
expected on Windows.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134020/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134020
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
