yonghong-song added a comment.

In D134705#3818657 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134705#3818657>, @dblaikie wrote:

> SGTM - could you also add some CHECKs in the test that show the enumeration 
> was added to the enumerators list on the CU (& you can probably test with 
> just one enumerator - don't need two in each test for instance)

Okay, will do.

> & I'm not quite following - what's the difference between the two cases being 
> tested? Oh, I guess the second has implicit conversions in the case 
> parameters? Fair enough, maybe would benefit from some comments.

Yes, the first is without implicit conversion and the second is with implicit 
conversion. I will add some comments to clarify it in the test.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D134705/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D134705

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to