ychen added a comment. In D134542#3814029 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134542#3814029>, @erichkeane wrote:
> Thanks for the quick review! Yeah, that case is a tough one, we don't really > have a good way of determining whether that was supposed to fail, or be the > best match. GCC does the option of just treating it as failed, so it'll have > the problem that I mentioned above. No idea what MSVC is doing though.... > thats frightening. This paper (https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2429r0.pdf) makes me like the current approach more. Basically, we better strive for intuitive diagnostics instead of diagnosing as many errors as possible but run the risk of lower-quality diagnostic messages. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134542/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134542 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
