Mordante added a comment. When I implemented P0479R5 I didn't look at earlier revisions of the paper. I'm a bit surprised to see revision 2 had a lot more information. (At that time I was less familiar with WG21 papers, so I didn't consider looking at older papers or notice the missing revision history.) I agree with @aaron.ballman's observation; revision 2 is unclear what the best solution regarding overriding PGO is.
I'm not really active in Clang at the moment so I feel @aaron.ballman has a better view of which approach to take for ``[[likely]]`` and PGO. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134456/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134456 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
