J-Camilleri marked 3 inline comments as done. J-Camilleri added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-access.cpp:23-27 + + // CHECK-DAG: !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_typedef, name: "pub_typedef",{{.*}} line: [[@LINE+1]],{{.*}} flags: DIFlagPublic) + typedef int pub_typedef; + pub_typedef pub_member; + ---------------- dblaikie wrote: > Arguably/I'd be fine with testing just one case here - since the > implementation of choosing when to put an access modifier, which modifier to > put, etc, is is already implemented and tested for other cases - so we might > not need to duplicate that testing for this case. > > But I don't mind too much either way. I agree with your assesment. I changed the test to just check that type aliases emit the flag not the logic of which flag is emitted. ================ Comment at: llvm/lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp:351 DIScope *Context, uint32_t AlignInBits, + DINode::DIFlags Flags, DINodeArray Annotations) { ---------------- dblaikie wrote: > While we usually split llvm & clang commits, in this case since it changes an > API used by clang, this part of the llvm change should go along with the > clang change. Regarding this and the previous comment about separating the llvm commit. Am I to have 2 commits as follows? 1. change llvm to emit flag + test case 2. modify llvm interface + change clang to emit flag + test case I do not have merge rights so I will ask for this when I get to the merge stage. Thanks for the review. ================ Comment at: llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/debug-info-access.ll:12-32 +; +; using pub_default_using = int; +; pub_default_using a_pub; ; }; ; ; class B : public A { ; public: ---------------- dblaikie wrote: > Probably don't need all this test coverage - since most of this is motivated > by the features up in clang - on the LLVM side we just need one case that > demonstrates that if we put an access specifier in the flags, that gets > emitted. I left the llvm to be the same as generated by the cpp file but changed the `CHECK` to just verify that the accessibility flag is emitted for a `typedef`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134339/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134339 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits