erichkeane added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/Interp/Boolean.h:50
explicit operator unsigned() const { return V; }
+ explicit operator int8_t() const { return V; }
----------------
tbaeder wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > At some point, do we want to rename this (and int) to use uint32_t/int32_t?
> I can do that as a follow-up commit if you want.
Please do, while we don't currently compile on any platforms with non-32 bit
int/unsigned, if we ever tried to this would fail with multiple definitions
somewhere.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D133934/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D133934
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
