jpenix-quic marked 2 inline comments as done.
jpenix-quic added inline comments.


================
Comment at: flang/runtime/environment.cpp:77
+#else
+  envp = environ;
+#endif
----------------
peixin wrote:
> What is `environ` used for? Should we try to keep as less extern variable as 
> possible in runtime for security.
I think `setenv` is only required to make sure that the `environ` pointer 
points to the correct copy of the environment variables. So, as long as we are 
storing a copy of the environment pointer in `ExecutionEnvironment` and 
potentially making changes to the environment via `setenv`, I think we need to 
base it off the `environ` pointer after `setenv` has been called rather than 
the `envp` from `main`.

That said, I don't think the `envp` variable we are storing is being used for 
anything at the moment (reading environment variables was changed to use 
`getenv` rather than `envp` in the commit [[ 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/824bf908194c9267f1f09065ba8e41d7969006ab
 | here]]). If removing the usage of `environ` is preferable, we could maybe 
remove the usage of `envp` altogether (in a separate patch)--does this sound 
like a good idea or would it be better to just leave in the `environ` usage for 
now?


================
Comment at: flang/test/Driver/emit-mlir.f90:16
 ! CHECK-NEXT: }
+! CHECK-NEXT: fir.global @_QQEnvironmentDefaults constant : 
!fir.ref<tuple<i[[int_size:.*]], !fir.ref<!fir.array<0xtuple<!fir.ref<i8>, 
!fir.ref<i8>>>>>> {
+! CHECK-NEXT:  %[[VAL_0:.*]] = fir.zero_bits !fir.ref<tuple<i[[int_size]], 
!fir.ref<!fir.array<0xtuple<!fir.ref<i8>, !fir.ref<i8>>>>>>
----------------
peixin wrote:
> jpenix-quic wrote:
> > peixin wrote:
> > > Is it possible not to generated this global variable if `fconvert=` is 
> > > not specified?
> > I'm not entirely sure--the issue I was running into was how to handle this 
> > in Fortran_main.c in a way which worked for all of GCC/Clang/Visual Studio 
> > (and maybe others?). I was originally thinking of doing this by using a 
> > weak definition of _QQEnvironmentDefaults set to nullptr so fconvert, etc. 
> > could override this definition without explicitly generating the fallback 
> > case. For GCC/clang, I think I could use __attribute__((weak)), but I 
> > wasn't sure how to handle this if someone tried to build with Visual Studio 
> > (or maybe another toolchain). I saw a few workarounds (ex: 
> > https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20200731-00/?p=104024) but I 
> > shied away from this since it seems to be an undocumented feature (and 
> > presumably only helps with Visual Studio). 
> > 
> > Do you know of a better or more general way I could do this? (Or, is there 
> > non-weak symbol approach that might be better that I'm missing?)
> How about generate one runtime function with the argument of 
> `EnvironmentDefaultList`? This will avoid this and using one extern variable?
> 
> If users use one variable with bind C name `_QQEnvironmentDefaults` in 
> fortran or one variable with name `_QQEnvironmentDefaults` in C, it is risky. 
> Would using the runtime function and static variable with the type 
> `EnvironmentDefaultList` in runtime be safer?
Agreed that there are potential risks with the current approach (although, are 
the `_Q*` names considered reserved?). Unfortunately, I think generating a call 
to set the environment defaults requires somewhat significant changes to the 
runtime. The runtime reads environment variables during initialization in 
`ExecutionEnvironment::Configure` which is ultimately called from the 
"hardcoded" `Fortran_main.c` and I need to set the defaults before this 
happens. So, I believe I'd either have to move the initialization to `_QQmain`  
or make it so that `main` isn't hardcoded so that I could insert the 
appropriate runtime function.

@klausler I think I asked you about this when I was first trying to figure out 
how to implement the environment defaults and you suggested I try the extern 
approach--please let me know if you have thoughts/suggestions around this!


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D130513/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D130513

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to