jrtc27 added a comment. In D129824#3794221 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129824#3794221>, @MaskRay wrote:
> Both D54214 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D54214> and this look like a surprising > behavior to me. Do we still have time to go back the state before D54214 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D54214> and make mismatching --target & -march= an > error? Then there's no -m32 equivalent; that's what -march currently gives you... also GCC lets you do it. And -target is Clang-specific so you can't write something that works for both compilers. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D129824/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D129824 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
