aaron.ballman added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/ASTDumper.cpp:205
+  if (const Decl *D = dyn_cast<Decl>(this))
+    D->dump();
+}
----------------
shafik wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > erichkeane wrote:
> > > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > > erichkeane wrote:
> > > > > One thing to note is that the 'else' case here is a little 
> > > > > uninformative.  See 
> > > > > https://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/DeclBase_8cpp_source.html#l00915 for 
> > > > > some similar logic here (though not sure we should be emulating that).
> > > > > 
> > > > > More, I wonder if there is SOME message here that should be dumped 
> > > > > for 'else'.
> > > > Looking at what inherits from `DeclContext`, is there use of it which 
> > > > is *not* a `Decl`? I couldn't find a use where it's not also a `Decl`.
> > > I've DEFINITELY run into it in the debugger before, but I have no idea 
> > > WHAT case that is. It is sometimes just "DeclContext is an invalid 
> > > pointer" kinda thing, so it might be worth-while to have SOME output 
> > > besides "print nothing", particularly when debugging.
> > IIRC, the case this comes up in is when the object is only partially 
> > constructed, and so I agree that having an `else` clause here would be 
> > useful -- because this interface is predominately used from a debugger, it 
> > has to deal with special "impossible" situations a bit more carefully.
> So looking at the other dump member functions, all of them seem to assume we 
> have a valid `DeclContext` and so they do not have any else either.
> 
> So maybe we want to think about making the rest a bit smarter as well?
> So maybe we want to think about making the rest a bit smarter as well?

What do you have in mind?

I think it's plausible to be in a partially constructed state in terms of when 
ctors are called, but I'm far less worried about people calling a dump method 
in the middle of the member inits happening.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D133499/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D133499

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to