erichkeane added a comment.

Patch seems sound, just a nit that we don't need a bunch of the asserts here, 
since the 'get' function already asserts it looks.  I'd like others to take a 
look too, but this looks acceptable to me.



================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp:1157
+          continue;
+        assert(PVD->hasUninstantiatedDefaultArg());
+        Expr *UninstExpr = PVD->getUninstantiatedDefaultArg();
----------------
This assert is unncessary, the line below will assert.  Same with the similar 
'assert' later on.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp:1159
+        Expr *UninstExpr = PVD->getUninstantiatedDefaultArg();
+        // FIXME: Obtain the source location for the '=' token.
+        SourceLocation EqualLoc = UninstExpr->getBeginLoc();
----------------
Looks like we don't store the equals-token location, so any attempt here 
probably would have to have ParmVarDecl store this location somewhere?


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp:2545
+    bool ForCallExpr) {
+  assert(Param->hasUninstantiatedDefaultArg());
+
----------------
Here too.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp:2303
+        // that downstream diagnostics are omitted.
+        assert(PVD->hasUninstantiatedDefaultArg());
+        Expr *UninstExpr = PVD->getUninstantiatedDefaultArg();
----------------
See above.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp:2705
+        // that downstream diagnostics are omitted.
+        assert(Params[P]->hasUninstantiatedDefaultArg());
+        Expr *UninstExpr = Params[P]->getUninstantiatedDefaultArg();
----------------
And again.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D133500/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D133500

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to