rnk added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D22426#486129, @DaveBartolomeo wrote:
> One reasonable solution would be to choose the toolset that is hosted on the
> same architecture as the host of clang.exe (e.g. x64-hosted Clang looks for
> x64-hosted MSVC). If this sounds good, I can make that change in a follow-up
> commit.
I like that, it seems more principled. In the meantime, I think we should go
with VC/amd64_{x86|arm}/bin instead. Maybe I'm biased, but I've seem more
linker failures due to address space exhaustion than 32-bit Windows kernels.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22426
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
