tbaeder added a comment. In D132997#3763094 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D132997#3763094>, @shafik wrote:
> I think like @aaron.ballman was saying in another PR you should aim for as > complete set of tests as possible even if you have to comment one that can't > work yet. For example cases that would involve `MemberExpr` or `UsingShadow` > for example as well as the cases you mentioned not implemented in your > description. I get it for the `MaterializeTemporaryExpr`s, but I don't understand why I would add tests using `MemberExpr` now and not when I work on record types (and references have already landed). CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D132997/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D132997 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
