iana added a comment. In D132971#3759538 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D132971#3759538>, @Bigcheese wrote:
> I'm fine with this change, but do we actually have a backwards compatibility > policy anywhere in Clang? Would be good to know what range of SDKs a compiler > release is expected to support. I don't know about backwards compatibility, but I found the Darwin module added the attribute in 2017 macOS 10.13/iOS 11.0. As far as I can tell from the original change, adding the attribute didn't actually fix anything, it was just used to detect cycles between libc++ and Darwin, so I think removing the hard code wouldn't even break older OSes. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D132971/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D132971 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
