sfertile added inline comments.
================ Comment at: llvm/lib/Bitcode/Writer/EmbedBitcodePass.cpp:26 + +PreservedAnalyses EmbedBitcodePass::run(Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &AM) { + if (M.getGlobalVariable("llvm.embedded.module", true)) ---------------- From the discourse discussion: 1) it was suggested that we remove the existing -fembed-bitcode functionality as Apple has stop supporting it. 2) mentioned that MLGO uses the option to embed the bitcode at various points in the pipeline depending on if its using LTO our not. Do we want the pass to be a bit more generic and be able to specify the global to use for embedding, and the section name to use as arguments? That way MLGO can keep using the section name it uses now . It also helps consuming tools to disambiguate between bitcode embedded for lto purpose from bitcode embedded for other purposes. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D131618/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D131618 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits