fdeazeve added a comment. In D116203#3740015 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D116203#3740015>, @cjdb wrote:
> In D116203#3739856 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D116203#3739856>, @fdeazeve > wrote: > >> It seems like non-lldb bots are also failing, if it makes it easier to >> reproduce: >> >> https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/Clang/job/clang-stage1-RA/30837/consoleFull#-54352964249ba4694-19c4-4d7e-bec5-911270d8a58c > > Thanks for flagging this. Based on the fact it only seems to be > `remove_reference_t`, I'm wondering if this is an issue with D131732 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131732> (which was merged immediately after > D116203 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D116203>). I'm not sure, to expand on my previous message, I tested these two commits which appear one right after the other in the log: - e9ef45635b77 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGe9ef45635b77598fc9ce0cd38d7d3f8c9d88a49d> (14 hou..) cjdb@g.. [clang] adds unary type transformations as compiler built-ins - d2d77e050b32 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGd2d77e050b32ce3f917688aeeb9e6f8f3c209560> (15 hou..) Ting.W.. [PowerPC][Coroutines] Add tail-call check with call information for coroutines The tests pass on `d2d77e050b32` and fail on `e9ef45635b77` Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D116203/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D116203 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
