inclyc added a comment. N2562.pdf:
> Modify 7.21.6.2p12: > ... > Unless a length modifier is specified, t~~T~~he corresponding argument shall > be a pointer to int ~~signed integer~~. Does this clarification statement mean that `hhd` should not be considered to correspond to `int`, but a `signed char`? If so, could this exactly imply that we have unmatched argument type? (i.e. `int` <--x--> `hhd` (signed char) ) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D132266/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D132266 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
