rymiel added a comment.
It seems that even with this patch, there is seemingly weird formatting with
the negation in requires clauses, such as:
template <typename T>
requires !F<T>
int bar(T t);
This is because the "fake parens" of the unary expression opened is never
closed by the special case clean-up made for requires clauses
However, it turns out this isn't even valid syntax, as it requires parentheses
for disambiguation. Adding those brings back correct indentation
template <typename T>
requires(!F<T>)
int bar(T t);
Is it okay to ignore this case, as it wouldn't even compile?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D131978/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D131978
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
