zahiraam added a comment.
I think I introduced a bug when replacing the VisitUnaryMinus/Plus/Imag/Real
with VisitMinus/Plus/Imag/Real. Now this simple test case is failing in the
non-promotion path (with the +avx512fp16).
_Float16 _Complex MinusOp_c_c(_Float16 c) {
return -c;
}
error: cannot compile this scalar expression yet
return -c;
^~
1 error generated.
The way I implemented it is that I have added the HANDLE_UNOP macro but I think
that's wrong. I think I need to keep the VisitUnary* methods and fork out of
them in the promotion path! Same for both Scalar and Complex Exprs. Your
thoughts?
Thanks.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D113107/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D113107
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
