bjope added a comment. FWIW, just some things noticed when I examined some of the new warning that popped up after this patch:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53253 mentioned that for example gcc complained about this. Although, as shown here https://godbolt.org/z/bq34Kexac there are some other differences that clang now complains already with -Wall, but that is not the case with gcc (I think one need to enable `-Wpedantic` in gcc to get a warning about signed overflow). A similar warning (when assigning -1 to an unsigned bitfield) can be given by both gcc and clang by using ` -Wsign-conversion` but that is not part of `-Wall` either. But maybe that is a totally different thing. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D131255/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D131255 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
