xazax.hun added a comment.
LLVM switched to C++17 recently. I am not sure whether this means
`std::optional` is preferred over `llvm::Optional`.
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TransferTest.cpp:3902
},
- {/*.ApplyBuiltinTransfer=*/true,
- /*.BuiltinTransferOptions=*/{/*.ContextSensitive=*/false}});
+ {TransferOptions{llvm::Optional<ContextSensitiveOptions>()}});
}
----------------
I think `llvm::None` is a more concise way to create an empty optional (akin to
`std::nullopt`).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D131779/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D131779
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
