li.zhe.hua marked an inline comment as done.
li.zhe.hua added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TypeErasedDataflowAnalysisTest.cpp:119
+ std::unique_ptr<ASTUnit> AST =
+ tooling::buildASTFromCodeWithArgs("int x = 0;", {"-std=c++11"});
+ HasWidenAnalysis Analysis(AST->getASTContext(),
----------------
ymandel wrote:
> nit: why c++11 (vs something later)?
Consistency with `runAnalysis` defined above. FWIW, I don't think `int x = 0;`
is materially different in any standard, and all I really want out of this is
an `ASTContext` to pass to `TypeErasedDataflowAnalysis` to satisfy its
constructor.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D131645/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D131645
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
