aaron.ballman added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20352#482590, @dberris wrote:
> It looks like I was using `hasArg` instead of `hasFlag`. The dangerous part > here is that OptSpecifier has an unsigned non-explicit argument, and I > suspect `bool` is being promoted to `unsigned` silently with clang/gcc. Still not quite right with the latest patch: C2664 'bool llvm::opt::ArgList::hasArg(llvm::opt::OptSpecifier,llvm::opt::OptSpecifier,llvm::opt::OptSpecifier) const': cannot convert argument 3 from 'bool' to 'llvm::opt::OptSpecifier' E:\llvm\llvm\tools\clang\lib\Driver\Tools.cpp 4608 I changed this to use hasFlag() instead, and then it compiled and tests passed. I've commit in r275330. http://reviews.llvm.org/D20352 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
