vsapsai added a comment.

In D126731#3670896 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126731#3670896>, @sammccall wrote:

> Hmm, I also don't know.
> The idea here is that we specifically depend only on the TokenKind enum from 
> TokenKinds.h (which doesn't need any generated headers), not on other headers 
> from clang/include/Basic (which might), and not on building/linking 
> clangBasic itself.
> In a modules world, maybe that means we need TokenKinds.h to be its own 
> module, or a non-modular header, or something?

I went with the approach of putting TokenKinds.h (and TokenKinds.def) into its 
own module D130377 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130377>.

In D126731#3670896 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126731#3670896>, @sammccall wrote:

> I'm also not sure on the support status of the modules build: I can't find a 
> buildbot covering it or docs. Is this something I need to fix, or is it an 
> experimental build like GN/Bazel?

I know at least about https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/lldb-cmake/ building 
with modules. I agree it's not a common configuration on buildbots but it's not 
experimental like GN/Bazel. As for the fixing the issue, it is covered by 
https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#quality , i.e., it is the author's 
responsibility but the reporter is responsible for making sure the author is 
equipped to do so (or fix themselves if they cannot help the author).


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D126731/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D126731

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to