erichkeane added a comment. In D126907#3667265 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907#3667265>, @ChuanqiXu wrote:
> In D126907#3665900 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907#3665900>, @erichkeane > wrote: > >> The more I look at this... the more I question my approach. I now am >> definitely sure we won't make Clang15, and hope that I can figure something >> better out for 16 :/ > > I feel like it could be helpful to split it into several small patches next > time. I REALLY wish I knew how to make that happen. The problem is the main idea (deferring instantiation) is an 'all or nothing' that really seems to break things. There are a handful of small-ish 'cleanup' tasks that I did along the way, and could probably come up with another, but I'm not sure how much I can remove from the patch to split it up :/ CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
