nickdesaulniers added a comment. In D129572#3645934 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129572#3645934>, @erichkeane wrote:
> Our typical rule is to keep the 1st one I think, and reject the 2nd. But then the _codegen_ will differ from GCC. And we _want_ clang to be a drop in replacement, so differing in behavior there is unacceptable. https://godbolt.org/z/rf16T83Kj IMO, the standards bodies focusing on standardizing attributes should clarify the semantics of attribute merging, _then_ compiler vendors should fix their compilers. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D129572/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D129572 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
