xazax.hun accepted this revision.
xazax.hun added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Some nits inline, but looks good to me.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/DebugSupport.cpp:119-133
+ std::vector<std::pair<std::string, std::string>> LinesData;
+ for (auto &AtomAssignment : AtomAssignments) {
+ auto Name = getAtomName(AtomAssignment.first);
+ MaxNameLength = std::max(MaxNameLength, Name.size());
+ LinesData.push_back({Name, debugString(AtomAssignment.second)});
+ }
+ llvm::sort(LinesData.begin(), LinesData.end());
----------------
In its current form, I think you could create the final strings in one step and
sort those strings instead of the pairs. Or do we expect alignment to mess up
the order in that case?
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/DebugSupportTest.cpp:417
+------------
+Satisfiable.
+
----------------
I don't see a test case for `Unsatisfiable` constraints.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D129548/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D129548
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
