erichkeane added a comment. In D126907#3636830 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907#3636830>, @erichkeane wrote:
> SO I've been playing with this for a while and all the libcxx issues. I THINK > we really need to just bit the bullet and figure out how to correctly re-add > things to the instantiation scope (after making the CheckFunctionConstraints > LocalInstantiationScope 'false' for the 2nd param). I can do it well enough > with functions since we have a function for it, but likely need to do the > same for at least RecordDecl. URGH.... And its not clear to me that I CAN do this, since a containing function template's body doesn't exist yet, so we cant go back and make those work. So we are at a point where we both have to inherit AND not inherit the paretn scope, and I have no idea on which basis to do so. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
