Mordante added a comment. Thanks @egorzhdan for working on this, I seem to have overlooked this item in the review queue. SGMT, but it seems the libc++ CI hasn't been triggered with this change. Maybe change one file in libc++ to give the CI a spin?
================ Comment at: clang/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.rst:278 + +This option enables various language and library features that are either experimental (also known as TSes), or have been standardized but are not stable yet. This option should not be used in production code, since neither ABI nor API stability are guaranteed. + ---------------- I'm not happy with the word "should", I don't want to decide what users should or should not do. Several of these experimental features are perfectly usable. If you can rebuild your entire software stack ABI and API stability might be less of an issue. (The lack of polish of some features might be a reason not to use them.) ================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td:1167 + "This option enables various language and library features that are either experimental (also known as TSes)," + " or have been standardized but are not stable yet. This option should not be used in production code, since " + "neither ABI nor API stability are guaranteed">, ---------------- Likewise regarding should. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D121141/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D121141 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
