courbet added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Tooling/Transformer/RewriteRule.cpp:56
T.Range = *EditRange;
- T.Replacement = std::move(*Replacement);
- T.Metadata = std::move(*Metadata);
+ if (E.Replacement) {
+ auto Replacement = E.Replacement->eval(Result);
----------------
ymandel wrote:
> Can this ever be null? I assume the intent was "no" (in which case I'd
> recommend an assert instead), but I'm open to the idea that it's valid, just
> want to understand better.
Given that we provide an `EditGenerator edit(ASTEdit)`, we can't ever be sure
that the user won't give us an empty replacement.
I've split this off to a separate patch here with a test to show the issue:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D128887
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D128807/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D128807
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
