samestep updated this revision to Diff 439415.
samestep added a comment.
- Merge branch 'diagnose-api' into diagnose-test-annotations
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D128446/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D128446
Files:
clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TestingSupport.h
clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/UncheckedOptionalAccessModelTest.cpp
Index: clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/UncheckedOptionalAccessModelTest.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/UncheckedOptionalAccessModelTest.cpp
+++ clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/UncheckedOptionalAccessModelTest.cpp
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
#include "TestingSupport.h"
#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h"
-#include "clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/SourceLocationsLattice.h"
#include "clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h"
#include "clang/Tooling/Tooling.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h"
@@ -28,6 +27,8 @@
using namespace dataflow;
using namespace test;
+using ::testing::ContainerEq;
+
// FIXME: Move header definitions in separate file(s).
static constexpr char CSDtdDefHeader[] = R"(
#ifndef CSTDDEF_H
@@ -1179,12 +1180,6 @@
} // namespace base
)";
-/// Converts `L` to string.
-static std::string ConvertToString(const llvm::DenseSet<SourceLocation> &L,
- const ASTContext &Ctx) {
- return L.empty() ? "safe" : "unsafe: " + DebugString(L, Ctx);
-}
-
/// Replaces all occurrences of `Pattern` in `S` with `Replacement`.
static void ReplaceAllOccurrences(std::string &S, const std::string &Pattern,
const std::string &Replacement) {
@@ -1205,18 +1200,14 @@
class UncheckedOptionalAccessTest
: public ::testing::TestWithParam<OptionalTypeIdentifier> {
protected:
- template <typename LatticeChecksMatcher>
- void ExpectLatticeChecksFor(std::string SourceCode,
- LatticeChecksMatcher MatchesLatticeChecks) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(SourceCode, ast_matchers::hasName("target"),
- MatchesLatticeChecks);
+ void ExpectDiagnosticsFor(std::string SourceCode) {
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(SourceCode, ast_matchers::hasName("target"));
}
private:
- template <typename FuncDeclMatcher, typename LatticeChecksMatcher>
- void ExpectLatticeChecksFor(std::string SourceCode,
- FuncDeclMatcher FuncMatcher,
- LatticeChecksMatcher MatchesLatticeChecks) {
+ template <typename FuncDeclMatcher>
+ void ExpectDiagnosticsFor(std::string SourceCode,
+ FuncDeclMatcher FuncMatcher) {
ReplaceAllOccurrences(SourceCode, "$ns", GetParam().NamespaceName);
ReplaceAllOccurrences(SourceCode, "$optional", GetParam().TypeName);
@@ -1260,10 +1251,30 @@
return Diagnosis.diagnose(Stmt, Env);
};
},
- [&MatchesLatticeChecks](llvm::DenseSet<SourceLocation> Locs,
- ASTContext &Ctx) {
- std::string StringifiedDiags = ConvertToString(Locs, Ctx);
- EXPECT_THAT(StringifiedDiags, MatchesLatticeChecks);
+ [](llvm::DenseMap<const Stmt *, std::string> &Annotations,
+ llvm::DenseSet<SourceLocation> &Locs, ASTContext &Ctx) {
+ auto &SrcMgr = Ctx.getSourceManager();
+
+ llvm::DenseSet<unsigned> AnnotationLines;
+ for (const auto &Pair : Annotations) {
+ auto *Stmt = Pair.getFirst();
+ AnnotationLines.insert(
+ SrcMgr.getPresumedLineNumber(Stmt->getBeginLoc()));
+ // We add both the begin and end locations, so that if the
+ // statement spans multiple lines then the test will fail. Going
+ // forward, we should change this to instead just get the single
+ // line number from the annotation itself, rather than looking
+ // at the statement it's attached to.
+ AnnotationLines.insert(
+ SrcMgr.getPresumedLineNumber(Stmt->getEndLoc()));
+ }
+
+ llvm::DenseSet<unsigned> DiagnosticLines;
+ for (SourceLocation &Loc : Locs) {
+ DiagnosticLines.insert(SrcMgr.getPresumedLineNumber(Loc));
+ }
+
+ EXPECT_THAT(DiagnosticLines, ContainerEq(AnnotationLines));
},
{"-fsyntax-only", "-std=c++17", "-Wno-undefined-inline"},
FileContents);
@@ -1282,65 +1293,55 @@
});
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, EmptyFunctionBody) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
void target() {
(void)0;
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, UnwrapUsingValueNoCheck) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target($ns::$optional<int> opt) {
- opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:5:7");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target($ns::$optional<int> opt) {
- std::move(opt).value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ std::move(opt).value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:5:7");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, UnwrapUsingOperatorStarNoCheck) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target($ns::$optional<int> opt) {
- *opt;
- /*[[check]]*/
+ *opt; // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:5:8");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target($ns::$optional<int> opt) {
- *std::move(opt);
- /*[[check]]*/
+ *std::move(opt); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:5:8");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, UnwrapUsingOperatorArrowNoCheck) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -1349,13 +1350,11 @@
};
void target($ns::$optional<Foo> opt) {
- opt->foo();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ opt->foo(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:9:7");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -1364,107 +1363,91 @@
};
void target($ns::$optional<Foo> opt) {
- std::move(opt)->foo();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ std::move(opt)->foo(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:9:7");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, HasValueCheck) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target($ns::$optional<int> opt) {
if (opt.has_value()) {
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, OperatorBoolCheck) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target($ns::$optional<int> opt) {
if (opt) {
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, UnwrapFunctionCallResultNoCheck) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
- Make<$ns::$optional<int>>().value();
+ Make<$ns::$optional<int>>().value(); // [[unsafe]]
(void)0;
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:5:7");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target($ns::$optional<int> opt) {
- std::move(opt).value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ std::move(opt).value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:5:7");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, DefaultConstructor) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt;
- opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:6:7");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, NulloptConstructor) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt($ns::nullopt);
- opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:6:7");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, InPlaceConstructor) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt($ns::in_place, 3);
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct Foo {};
@@ -1472,12 +1455,10 @@
void target() {
$ns::$optional<Foo> opt($ns::in_place);
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct Foo {
@@ -1487,12 +1468,10 @@
void target() {
$ns::$optional<Foo> opt($ns::in_place, 3, false);
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct Foo {
@@ -1502,46 +1481,38 @@
void target() {
$ns::$optional<Foo> opt($ns::in_place, {3});
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, ValueConstructor) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt(21);
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt = $ns::$optional<int>(21);
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ )");
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<$ns::$optional<int>> opt(Make<$ns::$optional<int>>());
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct MyString {
@@ -1551,12 +1522,10 @@
void target() {
$ns::$optional<MyString> opt("foo");
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct Foo {};
@@ -1568,12 +1537,10 @@
void target() {
$ns::$optional<Bar> opt(Make<Foo>());
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct Foo {
@@ -1583,14 +1550,12 @@
void target() {
$ns::$optional<Foo> opt(3);
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, ConvertibleOptionalConstructor) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -1602,13 +1567,11 @@
void target() {
$ns::$optional<Bar> opt(Make<$ns::$optional<Foo>>());
- opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:12:7");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -1620,13 +1583,11 @@
void target() {
$ns::$optional<Bar> opt(Make<$ns::$optional<Foo>>());
- opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:12:7");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -1639,13 +1600,11 @@
void target() {
$ns::$optional<Foo> opt1 = $ns::nullopt;
$ns::$optional<Bar> opt2(opt1);
- opt2.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ opt2.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:13:7");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct Foo {};
@@ -1658,12 +1617,10 @@
$ns::$optional<Foo> opt1(Make<Foo>());
$ns::$optional<Bar> opt2(opt1);
opt2.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct Foo {};
@@ -1676,25 +1633,21 @@
$ns::$optional<Foo> opt1(Make<Foo>());
$ns::$optional<Bar> opt2(opt1);
opt2.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, MakeOptional) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt = $ns::make_optional(0);
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct Foo {
@@ -1704,12 +1657,10 @@
void target() {
$ns::$optional<Foo> opt = $ns::make_optional<Foo>(21, 22);
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct Foo {
@@ -1720,99 +1671,83 @@
char a = 'a';
$ns::$optional<Foo> opt = $ns::make_optional<Foo>({a});
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, ValueOr) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt;
opt.value_or(0);
(void)0;
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, ValueOrComparison) {
// Pointers.
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target($ns::$optional<int*> opt) {
if (opt.value_or(nullptr) != nullptr) {
opt.value();
- /*[[check-ptrs-1]]*/
} else {
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-ptrs-2]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
}
- )code",
- "unsafe: input.cc:9:9");
+ )code");
// Integers.
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target($ns::$optional<int> opt) {
if (opt.value_or(0) != 0) {
opt.value();
- /*[[check-ints-1]]*/
} else {
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-ints-2]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
}
- )code",
- "unsafe: input.cc:9:9");
+ )code");
// Strings.
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target($ns::$optional<std::string> opt) {
if (!opt.value_or("").empty()) {
opt.value();
- /*[[check-strings-1]]*/
} else {
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-strings-2]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
}
- )code",
- "unsafe: input.cc:9:9");
+ )code");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target($ns::$optional<std::string> opt) {
if (opt.value_or("") != "") {
opt.value();
- /*[[check-strings-neq-1]]*/
} else {
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-strings-neq-2]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
}
- )code",
- "unsafe: input.cc:9:9");
+ )code");
// Pointer-to-optional.
//
// FIXME: make `opt` a parameter directly, once we ensure that all `optional`
// values have a `has_value` property.
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -1820,42 +1755,35 @@
$ns::$optional<int> *opt = &p;
if (opt->value_or(0) != 0) {
opt->value();
- /*[[check-pto-1]]*/
} else {
- opt->value();
- /*[[check-pto-2]]*/
+ opt->value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
}
- )code",
- "unsafe: input.cc:10:9");
+ )code");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, Emplace) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt;
opt.emplace(0);
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target($ns::$optional<int> *opt) {
opt->emplace(0);
opt->value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
// FIXME: Add tests that call `emplace` in conditional branches:
- // ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ // ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
// R"(
// #include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
//
@@ -1865,46 +1793,39 @@
// }
// if (b) {
// opt.value();
- // /*[[check-1]]*/
// } else {
- // opt.value();
- // /*[[check-2]]*/
+ // opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
// }
// }
- // )",
- // "unsafe: input.cc:12:9");
+ // )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, Reset) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt = $ns::make_optional(0);
opt.reset();
- opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:7:7");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target($ns::$optional<int> &opt) {
if (opt.has_value()) {
opt.reset();
- opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:7:9");
+ )");
// FIXME: Add tests that call `reset` in conditional branches:
- // ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ // ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
// R"(
// #include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
//
@@ -1914,19 +1835,16 @@
// opt.reset();
// }
// if (b) {
- // opt.value();
- // /*[[check-1]]*/
+ // opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
// } else {
// opt.value();
- // /*[[check-2]]*/
// }
// }
- // )",
- // "safe");
+ // )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, ValueAssignment) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct Foo {};
@@ -1935,12 +1853,10 @@
$ns::$optional<Foo> opt;
opt = Foo();
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct Foo {};
@@ -1949,12 +1865,10 @@
$ns::$optional<Foo> opt;
(opt = Foo()).value();
(void)0;
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct MyString {
@@ -1965,12 +1879,10 @@
$ns::$optional<MyString> opt;
opt = "foo";
opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
struct MyString {
@@ -1980,14 +1892,12 @@
void target() {
$ns::$optional<MyString> opt;
(opt = "foo").value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, OptionalConversionAssignment) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2002,12 +1912,10 @@
$ns::$optional<Bar> opt2;
opt2 = opt1;
opt2.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2022,14 +1930,12 @@
$ns::$optional<Bar> opt2;
if (opt2.has_value()) {
opt2 = opt1;
- opt2.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ opt2.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:15:9");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2044,41 +1950,35 @@
$ns::$optional<Bar> opt2;
(opt2 = opt1).value();
(void)0;
- /*[[check]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, NulloptAssignment) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt = 3;
opt = $ns::nullopt;
- opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:7:7");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt = 3;
- (opt = $ns::nullopt).value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ (opt = $ns::nullopt).value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:6:7");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, OptionalSwap) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2089,15 +1989,12 @@
opt1.swap(opt2);
opt1.value();
- /*[[check-1]]*/
- opt2.value();
- /*[[check-2]]*/
+ opt2.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:13:7");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2108,17 +2005,14 @@
opt2.swap(opt1);
opt1.value();
- /*[[check-3]]*/
- opt2.value();
- /*[[check-4]]*/
+ opt2.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:13:7");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, StdSwap) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2129,15 +2023,12 @@
std::swap(opt1, opt2);
opt1.value();
- /*[[check-1]]*/
- opt2.value();
- /*[[check-2]]*/
+ opt2.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:13:7");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2148,19 +2039,16 @@
std::swap(opt2, opt1);
opt1.value();
- /*[[check-3]]*/
- opt2.value();
- /*[[check-4]]*/
+ opt2.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:13:7");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, UniquePtrToStructWithOptionalField) {
// We suppress diagnostics for values reachable from smart pointers (other
// than `optional` itself).
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2177,16 +2065,13 @@
void target() {
smart_ptr<Foo> foo;
*foo->opt;
- /*[[check-1]]*/
*(*foo).opt;
- /*[[check-2]]*/
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, CallReturningOptional) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2195,12 +2080,10 @@
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt = 0;
opt = MakeOpt();
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-1]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:9:7");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ )");
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2209,13 +2092,11 @@
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt = 0;
opt = MakeOpt();
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-2]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:9:7");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2225,13 +2106,11 @@
void target() {
IntOpt opt = 0;
opt = MakeOpt();
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-3]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:10:7");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2241,16 +2120,14 @@
void target() {
IntOpt opt = 0;
opt = MakeOpt();
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-4]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:10:7");
+ )");
}
// Verifies that the model sees through aliases.
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, WithAlias) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2258,18 +2135,16 @@
using MyOptional = $ns::$optional<T>;
void target(MyOptional<int> opt) {
- opt.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:8:7");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, OptionalValueOptional) {
// Basic test that nested values are populated. We nest an optional because
// its easy to use in a test, but the type of the nested value shouldn't
// matter.
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2278,14 +2153,12 @@
void target($ns::$optional<Foo> foo) {
if (foo && *foo) {
foo->value();
- /*[[access]]*/
}
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
// Mutation is supported for nested values.
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2294,18 +2167,16 @@
void target($ns::$optional<Foo> foo) {
if (foo && *foo) {
foo->reset();
- foo->value();
- /*[[reset]]*/
+ foo->value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:9:9");
+ )");
}
// Tests that structs can be nested. We use an optional field because its easy
// to use in a test, but the type of the field shouldn't matter.
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, OptionalValueStruct) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2316,18 +2187,16 @@
void target($ns::$optional<Foo> foo) {
if (foo && foo->opt) {
foo->opt.value();
- /*[[access]]*/
}
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, OptionalValueInitialization) {
// FIXME: Fix when to initialize `value`. All unwrapping should be safe in
// this example, but `value` initialization is done multiple times during the
// fixpoint iterations and joining the environment won't correctly merge them.
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2346,15 +2215,13 @@
}
// Now we merge the two values. UncheckedOptionalAccessModel::merge() will
// throw away the "value" property.
- foo->value();
- /*[[merge]]*/
+ foo->value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:19:7");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, AssignThroughLvalueReferencePtr) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2366,56 +2233,48 @@
void target() {
smart_ptr<$ns::$optional<float>> x;
*x = $ns::nullopt;
- (*x).value();
- /*[[check]]*/
+ (*x).value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:12:7");
+ )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, CorrelatedBranches) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"code(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target(bool b, $ns::$optional<int> opt) {
if (b || opt.has_value()) {
if (!b) {
opt.value();
- /*[[check-1]]*/
}
}
}
- )code",
- "safe");
+ )code");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"code(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target(bool b, $ns::$optional<int> opt) {
if (b && !opt.has_value()) return;
if (b) {
opt.value();
- /*[[check-2]]*/
}
}
- )code",
- "safe");
+ )code");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target(bool b, $ns::$optional<int> opt) {
if (opt.has_value()) b = true;
if (b) {
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-3]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
}
- )code",
- "unsafe: input.cc:7:9");
+ )code");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"code(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target(bool b, $ns::$optional<int> opt) {
@@ -2423,41 +2282,35 @@
if (opt.has_value()) b = true;
if (b) {
opt.value();
- /*[[check-4]]*/
}
}
- )code",
- "safe");
+ )code");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target(bool b, $ns::$optional<int> opt) {
if (opt.has_value() == b) {
if (b) {
opt.value();
- /*[[check-5]]*/
}
}
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target(bool b, $ns::$optional<int> opt) {
if (opt.has_value() != b) {
if (!b) {
opt.value();
- /*[[check-6]]*/
}
}
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target(bool b) {
@@ -2470,30 +2323,26 @@
}
if (opt2.has_value()) {
opt1.value();
- /*[[check]]*/
}
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
// FIXME: Add support for operator==.
- // ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ // ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
// #include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
//
// void target($ns::$optional<int> opt1, $ns::$optional<int> opt2) {
// if (opt1 == opt2) {
// if (opt1.has_value()) {
// opt2.value();
- // /*[[check-7]]*/
// }
// }
// }
- // )",
- // "safe");
+ // )");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, JoinDistinctValues) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2506,16 +2355,13 @@
}
if (opt.has_value()) {
opt.value();
- /*[[check-1]]*/
} else {
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-2]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
}
- )code",
- "unsafe: input.cc:15:9");
+ )code");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"code(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target(bool b) {
@@ -2528,12 +2374,10 @@
if (!opt.has_value()) return;
}
opt.value();
- /*[[check-3]]*/
}
- )code",
- "safe");
+ )code");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2545,13 +2389,11 @@
} else {
opt = Make<$ns::$optional<int>>();
}
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-4]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )code",
- "unsafe: input.cc:12:7");
+ )code");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2563,12 +2405,10 @@
opt = 2;
}
opt.value();
- /*[[check-5]]*/
}
- )code",
- "safe");
+ )code");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"code(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
@@ -2579,75 +2419,65 @@
} else {
opt = Make<$ns::$optional<int>>();
}
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-6]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
}
- )code",
- "unsafe: input.cc:11:7");
+ )code");
}
TEST_P(UncheckedOptionalAccessTest, ReassignValueInLoop) {
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt = 3;
while (Make<bool>()) {
opt.value();
- /*[[check-1]]*/
}
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(R"(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt = 3;
while (Make<bool>()) {
opt.value();
- /*[[check-2]]*/
opt = Make<$ns::$optional<int>>();
if (!opt.has_value()) return;
}
}
- )",
- "safe");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt = 3;
while (Make<bool>()) {
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-3]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
opt = Make<$ns::$optional<int>>();
}
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:7:9");
+ )");
- ExpectLatticeChecksFor(
+ ExpectDiagnosticsFor(
R"(
#include "unchecked_optional_access_test.h"
void target() {
$ns::$optional<int> opt = 3;
while (Make<bool>()) {
- opt.value();
- /*[[check-4]]*/
+ opt.value(); // [[unsafe]]
opt = Make<$ns::$optional<int>>();
if (!opt.has_value()) continue;
}
}
- )",
- "unsafe: input.cc:7:9");
+ )");
}
// FIXME: Add support for:
Index: clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TestingSupport.h
===================================================================
--- clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TestingSupport.h
+++ clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TestingSupport.h
@@ -219,7 +219,9 @@
std::function<Diagnosis<typename AnalysisT::Lattice, llvm::DenseSet<Diag>>(
ASTContext &)>
MakeDiagnosis,
- std::function<void(llvm::DenseSet<Diag>, ASTContext &)> Expectations,
+ std::function<void(llvm::DenseMap<const clang::Stmt *, std::string> &,
+ llvm::DenseSet<Diag> &, ASTContext &)>
+ Expectations,
ArrayRef<std::string> Args,
const tooling::FileContentMappings &VirtualMappedFiles = {}) {
return checkDataflowHelper(
@@ -229,7 +231,8 @@
auto Diags = diagnoseCFG(
AnalysisResults.CFCtx, AnalysisResults.BlockStates,
AnalysisResults.Env, AnalysisResults.Analysis, Diagnose);
- Expectations(Diags, AnalysisResults.Context);
+ Expectations(AnalysisResults.Annotations, Diags,
+ AnalysisResults.Context);
},
Args, VirtualMappedFiles);
}
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
