aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/infrastructure/verify-config.cpp:12 + +// CHECK-VERIFY-DAG: command-line option '-config': warning: Unknown Check 'readability-else-after-ret'; did you mean 'readability-else-after-return' +// CHECK-VERIFY-DAG: command-line option '-config': warning: Unknown Check Option 'modernize-lop-convert.UseCxx20ReverseRanges'; did you mean 'modernize-loop-convert.UseCxx20ReverseRanges' ---------------- njames93 wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > It's unfortunate that `warning: ` appears in the middle of the diagnostic > > as opposed to at the start. I wonder if this can be reworked to say: > > `warning: Unknown check 'whatever'; did you mean 'whatever'? > > [-verify-config]` or something? > > > > Also, no test coverage for the error case and for the unknown check case > > where there's no closest match worth talking about. > Warning appearing in the middle is kind of by design as when clang emits > diagnostics, the source location is the first thing emitted, then the > type(warning|error). In this case `command-line option '-config'` is the > "source location" > > > Also, no test coverage for the error case. > I'm not 100% on that, there is no checking when the check glob is actually > built and I haven't figured out how to break it. > then the type(warning|error). In this case command-line option '-config' is > the "source location" Ah, thanks for explaining your logic. FWIW, Clang uses a different style for that (`<command line>`): https://godbolt.org/z/f1rdsbjqe Perhaps we should follow suit? (In fact, we could use the diagnostic engine for this instead of emitting to the error stream ourselves?) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D127446/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D127446 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
