martong accepted this revision.
martong added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

In D127742#3582236 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D127742#3582236>, @steakhal wrote:

> In D127742#3581874 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D127742#3581874>, @martong wrote:
>
>> Why not replace all `getAs`?
>
> That's a massive change. I actually experimented with it and I see no 
> advantage with that.
>
>> I suppose you picked conditions because `isa` can have variadic parameters. 
>> If we are about to keep `getAs` then why not replace only those occurrences 
>> where we see the benefit of the variadic `isa`?
>
> I believe it reads more naturally. `getAs<>` should be used only if we care 
> about the value and don't know if it has one.

Ok, makes sense. LGTM.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D127742/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D127742

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to