owenpan added a comment.
In D127484#3574992 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D127484#3574992>, @MyDeveloperDay
wrote:
> Oh gosh! It hard to make such changes and someone else not call them a
> regression, I’m not sure how I feel. We do kind of have to be able to fix
> bugs and if this gets closer to gnu style then I guess it’s better
+1.
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:23954
+ "\t{\n"
+ "\t printf (\"%d, %d\\n\", i, j);\n"
+ "\t}\n"
----------------
To simplify the test case a little bit.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D127484/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D127484
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
